This sounds like a good reason to have a different corporation as a beneficiary for each land trust property. If an attorney asks you in court if you have a beneficial interest in any property it seems like you could honestly says “No sir, I do not”(because you don’t, but your corporation(s) do).
I purchased a property in Feb. (it’s a keeper). After rehabbing it and getting a great tenant in there. This week,I took a file with the deed, insurance binder, photos, lease agreement, tenant’s application, and more important docs.
My lender was busy gone when I dropped it off. He called today and said everything looks good BUT the deed list a trust and the insurance binder list a LLC as the owner. I said, the LLC is the beneficiary of the Trust. Would you like for me to Quit Claim it back to the LLC. He say, “No… I just wanted to know how the principal owner was…”
Posted by Bronchick on April 20, 2000 at 20:34:35:
Most lenders won’t lend in trust because of FNMA guidelines. I have pulled it off a few times when the processor wasn’t paying attention, but it is LUCK!
Posted by Ben in Ohio on April 21, 2000 at 07:06:47:
Yesterday I went to my attorney friend and asked him to review a Land Trust I had acquired from the local REIA. I’m closing Monday and have considered putting this one in the Trust, this would be my first in a Trust as all my others are in my name. He didn’t think it was necessary. He has a lawsuit against a RE investor for specific performance on a deal gone bad. The atty plans on deposing him and/or putting him on the stand and questioning him on any beneficial interest he may have in property. SO my question is where is the advantage?? Thanks in advance.
This atty is one of a thousand that knows about land trusts. Even so, specific performance against a trust won’t result in liability against the beneficiary, so the trustee may be able to refuse to answer the Q.