Posted by John Katitus on January 07, 1999 at 24:27:11:
He definitely was not referring to only non-quals.
Posted by John Katitus on January 07, 1999 at 24:27:11:
He definitely was not referring to only non-quals.
Could Carlton be wrong? - Posted by John Katitus
Posted by John Katitus on January 06, 1999 at 01:38:30:
I am listening to Sheets’ “No Money Down” and have a question. He says that all assumable loans do not contain a Due-On-Sale clause. If this is true, is there any reason to keep ownership transfer secret on these loans? There must be some qualifying information he left out.
Re: Could Carlton be wrong? - Posted by Joey P SE AL
Posted by Joey P SE AL on January 06, 1999 at 03:15:49:
I think that when he says “assumable” and starts talking about “due-on-sale” clauses, what he really means is Non-Qualifying Assumable.
Joey