Re: made up stories better then sheets - Posted by Del-Ohio
Posted by Del-Ohio on October 04, 2003 at 18:17:07:
Its not the no money down that is problematic. We do this all the time. We have a 500,000 WOLC. When we use it to puchase a house cash and rehab it, since none of our own money was used you could technically call this a no money down deal.
We do these deals all the time, it is our primary strategy for “rehab/sell”, for “rehab/keep” we mortgage at 80% and use owner carrying down and/or equity in another property as down payment. So I have no difficulty with the no money down concept.
What should send up red flags for all investors who have to analyze data to get/make good deals,is the information provided. Not just one flag but numerous ones are in the scenario provided.
Here is the information I copied directly from Jerrys Post
>Posted by Jerry Martin NC on October 03, 2003 at 20:07:12:
>HUD STATEMENT FROM YESTERDAY’S CLOSING.
Yesterday according to my calculations would be Oct 2.
then Jerry says
CONTRACT WAS SIGNED SATURDAY 10-04-03.
A little incongruent
CLOSING WAS YESTERDAY 10-09-03.
Jerry posted on October 3 but he closed yesterday on October 9. What do you make of this?
>ROOF WAS FINISHED TODAY
So he closed yesterday and finished the roof today. Did he finish the roof the day after he closed or four days before he closed on October 9.
AND THE REST OF REHAB WILL BE FINISHED 10-16-03
Looking at this makes all the rest unbelievable to me. I hope the people who took this at face value do a bit more due diligence when they buy property.
Del-Ohio