John Beck's Free & Clear RE System??? - Posted by Dave-PA

Re: Yeah, Dave, but… - Posted by Bob Smith

Posted by Bob Smith on February 24, 2007 at 10:52:34:

Why didn’t the tax authorities name the lessee to wipe them out during foreclosure, forcing them to pay the taxes? If you can’t do that I can imagine plenty of angry property owners stiffing the city by giving a friend a 30 year lease for a dollar and then not paying their taxes. I also don’t understand your musings about renewal. If the lease expires in 30 years, why are you wondering whether ATT would renew it?

Re: Yeah, Dave, but… - Posted by David Krulac

Posted by David Krulac on February 24, 2007 at 18:21:16:

because it was a non-judicial sale and the liens/and or leases are not wiped out and carry forward to the new owner. I never thought it was a deal let alone a good deal, what was trying to say why I didn’t think it was a good deal. ATT did pay their rent in advance for 30 years, I’m sure at market rent.

As to renting to your friend for a dollar, it does seem like that would stand up in court under many legal principals including fraud and undue enrichment. The ATT lease is neither a ruse or a fraud.