Paying Down Loans Early VS Buying More Properties - Posted by Ronald * Starr(in No CA)
Posted by Ronald * Starr(in No CA) on July 15, 2002 at 21:38:43:
Izzy–(NY)----------------
Good for you starting at an early age. Your plan is sensible, probably feasible.
However, you may find, after doing some more studying, that you do not want to sock away your free cash flow into equity in the properties that you initially own.
Different people have different approaches and tolerances for risk. So you do need to do a program that suits you. The following ideas may stimulate you to figure out what you want to do with excess cash or investable cash.
When you have a lot of equity in a property, some people call it “dead equity.” That is because two of your three financial benefits of real estate investing are going to be the same, regardless of the size of your equity or debt. The tax benefits are based on the purchase price of the property and different levels of debt do not influence the tax benefits.
The appreciation on the property is based mainly on the initial value of the property. Provided you keep the property maintained well, the appreciation will not be different with a large loan secured on the property or no loan secured on the property.
So, the only financial benefit that is effected by the amount of debt you are carrying is the spendable cash flow, after expenses and debt service. Loans are often the highest of the expenses, so when they go away, the cash flow can jump dramatically. This certainly looks attractive.
However, there is another way to think about the debt that you carry on an income-producing property. When you pay down the debt, this is the equivalent of investing your cash at the interest rate on the mortgage. You save, say, $70 a year by having paid off $1,000 in mortgage burden for a loan with seven percent interest rate. This is like having $70 a year paid to you for your $1,000 “investment” in the loan.
If you don’t have other places to invest that excess cash which pays you more than the loan interest rate, then it makes a lot of sense to pay down the loan early. However, if you find you can earn more per year with the cash than the interest rate of the mortgage, you would probably be better off putting that extra cash into the other investment, rather than paying down the loan early.
Now, there are some considerations which influence this. For instance, your tolerance for risk. Paying down the mortgage is a very conserve, low-risk way to “invest” your money. There is a risk you might not think of: “opportunity cost” risk that you will have to forego some other good investment because your money is tied up in the dead equity.
Also, to really compare the return on the early payoff of the debt vs other investments, you really should use a “risk-adjusted” return for each projection. If the other investment might have a very lucrative return but it has a high probability of a poor return, this is not as good a risk as the loan paydown. Thus, it needs to generate a higher return just to be equivalent to the early amortization of the loan.
However, if you invest in leveraged real estate and have any decent appreciation where you invest, you should be able to get far better returns with your extra cash than you get by paying down the mortgage earlier than called for by the amortization schedule.
If, instead of socking away your free cash flow in equity buildup of existing properties, you used it to buy more, leveraged properties, you probably will find the financial rewards to be greater. You will have more property to depreciate, increasing the tax benefits, provided that your taxable income does not exceed $150K a year. You will have more property which can appreciate in value also.
Depending upon what rate of return the new properties will provide in cash flow, you might even have more cash flow than if you simply stuck with the original prooperties and paid down the loans.
Think about this. The paydown on the loan gains you the rate of interest of the loan each year. Suppose this to be 7%. But, you buy new properties that provide you 15% cash on cash return. That is, you make 15% cash flow on each dollar invested in the new properties. This would not be an unusally high return for a good investment. So, would you rather have 7% return on your investable cash by paying down the original loans or would you rather have 15% return on that same cash, which is socked away into new, leveraged properties?
Now, with more properties, you may find yourself working more. So you might well want to do an analysis whereby you calculate how much additional cash return you get for the additional work. There is essentially no extra work to paying off a loan earlier. You have to write some figure on the monthly mortgage payment check, and it is no more work to write a larger amount than a smaller.
You might find that the extra money you generate from the new properties is a very handsome reward for the necessary added time to own them.
When you wanted to retire, you could, as one of the other posters mentioned, sell some of your properties if you wanted a large amount of cash. Or, you could sell them with you carrying back mortgages to provide a cash flow stream. Or, you might have enough cash flow from the increased number of properties, even with their loans not yet paid off, to satisfy you.
So, I hope that you see that paying down debt, while it has some attractions, may not be the most lucrative deployment of your investable dollars. When you are good at buying and managing long-term hold rental properties, you may prefer to sock away your extra money by buying more properties, not paying down mortgages early on the properties that you already own.
Good InvestingRon Starr***