Posted by Kristine-CA on February 26, 2011 at 20:51:10:
Ben: again, thanks for sharing your thoughts and experiences. I think
the CRE world really fails to debate the homeownership issue. Should
people with little skin in the game buy a house. Should renters
become owners. Does homeownership fit with the bigger financial
picture and future goals of the buyers. Do the buyers even have any
goals? Or are we just creating a need where there isn’t one. Everyone
needs someplace to live, but not everyone needs to own a house, to be
sure.
Landlording is plenty creative as it requires working with people and
houses (repairs!) and finances, all of which can be moving every which
way at any given time. There’s a rehab buyer/landlord that I’ve sold
about six houses to, some of which I’ve carried back paper. I called
him the other day to talk to him about another deal. I let him know
that every time I get a check in the mail from him I know what it
represents. It represents repairs and evictions and collecting that rent,
usually in person in our farm. Not to mention managing the paper
work and his other businesses (he owns an auto body shop and some
self storage props). He’s plenty creative for me.
The CRE I’m still interested in and continue to be enthusiastic about is
working with sellers. Distressed sellers and distressed properties. I
still like figuring out how to buy something that the sellers can’t sell or
think they can’t sell. I still like working with sellers and heirs the best.