using equity as down payment - Posted by corky

Posted by Mark (SDCA) on March 15, 1999 at 16:13:17:

It doesnt really differ from borrowing against the equity. But it is cheaper (no points, no fees). And if the seller will go for it, it gives you access to 100% of your equity. No bank will do that.
The default issue is the real question. The seller would have a problem. That is why he better be motivated.
You use the equity in A to buy B. Then you use the equity in B to buy C.
Quick example. You own A, FMV 100K, equity 20K. You offer a 2nd mortgage on A to seller of B (FMV 200K), for his equity and assume the 1st mortgage of 180K. Now you have 0 equity in A and 20K in B. Use the 20K in B to buy C. And so on. It’s called pyramiding your profits. (VERY aggressive so be careful).
Cheers,

Mark

PS You would probly get more responses by posting this on newsgroup I.

using equity as down payment - Posted by corky

Posted by corky on March 10, 1999 at 12:02:40:

A little confusion here about using equity in another property as a down payment. How does this differ from just borrowing against the equity? And if a seller is holding a mtg with equity in another property as collateral, how would he recoup his losses in the event of a default? Also, if you use equity in property A to buy B, how can you use it again to buy C?