The manner in which this landlord is presenting this deal saying he would like to make this house appear to be a 2nd home for him is immoral and illegal.
This guys obviously trying to pull one over on Uncle Sam. It would be a great L/O deal but the way the landlord is handling it the deal could turn out messier than a diaper on a baby!
I have lived in a rental in San Diego for the last 2 years and my lease is up for renewal. I asked my landlord if he would be interested in selling me the house. To my surprise, he said that he would be willing to do it if I am willing to do a creative financing deal. He gave me a brief explanation of how it works but I’m having a little trouble following the concept. Here is the basic idea.
He told me that after we agree on a selling price, I would give him a down payment (this locks in the selling price). For the next 2 years I would continue to rent the property. I would put the utilities in his name but I would continue to pay them. Then at the end of 2 years we would put the property through escrow and transfer the title over to me. He would then carry the note at an interest rate of 7.5% monthly. He wants to do it this way because he says for the 2 years I continue to pay rent, this property will be considered a second home for him. That way when the title is transfered, he won’t have to pay capital gains on the sale.
Has anybody ever heard of or used this kind of deal either as a buyer or a seller? What are the benifits and pitfalls of doing it this way? Is this a good deal for me the buyer? What else should I know and what should I look out for when setting up the deal? How do I make sure I don’t get ripped off?
I appreciate any advice you could give me. Thanks!!
Chris:
I am just a newbie, but after having read Ernest Tew’s book ( How to Get Rich Helping Others ), I think the best thing would be to convince your seller to go with a net lease and purchase the option to buy in a Roth IRA. That way your seller would get the Capital Gains Tax relief he desires and you would get to lease the house during the term desired. Ernest talks all about this in his book and even gives you a soft copy of the forms you would need.
“He wants to do it this way because he says for the 2 years I continue to pay rent, this property will be considered a second home for him. That way when the title is transfered, he won’t have to pay capital gains on the sale.”
The gentlemen does not understand the law here. In order for him to not pay captial gains on the transaction, he would have had to have PERSONALLY occupied the home for two of the last five years. So he gets the utilities transferred to his name, but you continue to pay them. Whose credit does that help? And isn’t he a trusting soul?
You’ve been there two years…now he wants to “live” there on paper for two years to avoid the capital gains tax. Where is he living now? Isn’t he claiming an interest deduction on the place where he’s living? And does he expect to “skate” through the IRS computers when they catch him with TWO PRIMARY RESIDENCES? As David Krulac asks below, “Can you say fraud and tax evasion?” I would ask another question:
Do you want to sully your character and reputation by being an accessory to this scheme? I thought not.
That being said, let me point you to an avenue where you can still L/O the house, keep the utilities in YOUR name, and bypass the capital gains problem.
It’s called a 1031 exchange. I do not know exactly how this works (haven’t had to do one yet,) but I understand the principle as it is used with life insurance contracts (where it is called a 1035 exchange.)
You may want to ask for assistance from a RE attorney on how to structure this. There are also RE Brokers who specialized in this type of transaction.
Look around this site, there is lots of information about lease options. Some investors specialise in them. They are completely legal,moral etc. So don’t be afraid to do it if it suits your needs, but make sure you have the deal checked by a real estate lawyer before you sign anything.