I rarely run any offer past my lawyer, but most sellers run EVERYTHING past the lawyer … I’m just being considerate and expediant … a lawyer has fun with one of my contracts, I don’t want to give him three!!!
Basically, you present two or three offers at the same time, any of which will work for you, and let the seller choose one. Sheets suggests doing this in a “letter of intent” if you’re not face-to-face, rather than making up 3 separate contracts.
I must disagree with the letter of intent part … in fact, I’ve found my market very accepting of them … especially in the multiple offer mode … who wants to pay to have an attorney review 2 or three whole contracts when the basics fit on one page???
I understand that this will vary by market, but it works for me.
BG,
CS also says that you need to make clear that each offer is stand alone. Do not let the seller choose terms from each offer and combine them to their liking.
Can you imagine if you offer to pay higher price if the seller carry’s paper, and then offer low price for ALL cash.
Now, your seller says, “I’ll take all cash at the higher price!”
NOT!
Go for it, and skip the “letter of intent” unless your dealing with FSBO’s.
Banks and other institutional sellers will not even consider a “letter of intent”.
PLUS, with the contract in hand, the seller can sign right away, and it is legally binding. A signed “letter of intent” is easily backed out of.
Some Lenders/Sellers (REO’s mostly) I’ve delt with will not even look at my offer until I sign the “as is” addendum they require.